White House prepares for Robert Mueller’s report — whatever it says

The White House made a quiet but notable personnel change a few weeks ago, moving a veteran staff attorney to a press office that is preparing a response to the much-anticipated final report from special counsel Robert S. Mueller III — whatever it says, whenever it comes.

The transfer of Steven Groves to a press shop staffed largely by young assistants and interns came as the White House counsel’s office, where Groves previously was assigned, has made at least 17 new hires.

Together these actions show that a White House known for lack of planning is scrambling to prepare for Mueller’s findings about Russian support for Trump in the 2016 election — and for the gathering storm of Democratic-led congressional inquiries into Trump’s businesses, private foundation and activities in office.

Whether Trump is vindicated or placed in legal jeopardy — or more likely something in between — the White House, its allies and its critics are readying legal strategies and talking points for a potential pivot in his presidency.

The president’s legal team has prepared a roughly 80-page counter-report that could be released in whole or in part depending on what Mueller alleges, according to Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former New York City mayor who is representing Trump.

For example, Giuliani said, if Mueller mentions the notorious June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in New York involving three top Trump aides — his son Donald Trump Jr., son-in-law Jared Kushner and campaign chairman Paul Manafort — and a Kremlin-linked lawyer promising dirt on Hillary Clinton, “we would point out that nothing ever happened and it never went anywhere.”

The White House response could also be very short if Mueller gives Trump a clean bill of health.

“If they exonerate him,” Giuliani said, “we’ll just say congratulations.”

Under Justice Department regulations, Mueller is required to deliver his final report to Atty. Gen. William Barr. During his Senate confirmation process, Barr vowed to be as transparent as the law allowed but did not commit to releasing the entire document to Congress or the public.

Trump’s top surrogates held at least one conference call to lay out arguments they could use — either in court or on cable TV — to try to block release of information they considered unfair or damaging to the president or his administration.

Attorneys on the call said redactions might be necessary in the Mueller report to protect grand jury testimony and other legally privileged information, and should not be construed as a coverup, according to a participant who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Liberal activists, in turn, have planned protests to pressure Congress and Barr to ensure Mueller’s full findings become public. With polls showing overwhelming public support for release, House Democrats have pledged to hold hearings and issue subpoenas if necessary.

 

Staff Favourites View more

Staff Favourites
When you or our staff find great progressive news articles, we post them here. Send along your personal favourite story links to: favourites (at) ukprogressive (dot) co (dot) uk and we may select it for publication.

Leave a Comment