President Trump has spent his tenure in office shattering norms of presidential conduct, and his disdain for legal restraints may be about to reach another level. The possibility that Trump will fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller is becoming very real, and there’s no doubt that, at the very least, Trump is actively trying to undermine Mueller’s investigation. The fact that an unprecedentedly corrupt president is interfering with a critical investigation into his own financial practices and his campaign’s apparent collusion with Russia in the 2016 elections constitutes a major threat to the rule of law. But we should remember that the Constitution provides a remedy that could address Trump’s lawlessness. The problem is that congressional Republicans are abdicating their oversight responsibilities for partisan reasons.
The threat that Trump might fire Muller is clear. In a remarkable interview with The New York Times last week, Trump said that “a special counsel should never have been appointed.” More strikingly, he said that if Attorney General Jeff Sessions “was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else.” The belief that the attorney general owes personal loyalty to the president demonstrates the difference between a president who respects the rule of law and one who does not. And given that Trump has already fired FBI Director James Comey to obstruct the investigation into Russia’s electoral interference, it’s not a huge stretch to think that Mueller might be next.
And despite the (not actually true) cliché that “it’s the coverup, not the crime,” it’s nearly certain that Trump is engaging in a coverup because he’s guilty of serious wrongdoing. It’s telling that Trump’s most strenuous objections have come after Mueller’s team started to look into Trump’s financial transactions. There’s a reason Trump violated longstanding norms by refusing to release his tax returns, and it’s certainly not because he has nothing to hide.
So we have a president who may well be guilty of serious offenses, and these offenses may have involved colluding with a foreign power’s interference into an election. And yet, Trump can probably fire Mueller and get away with it, at least in the short term. How?
In some respects, America’s Constitution might allow Trump to evade accountability. The American people saw enough problems with Trump to reject him at the ballot box, but the Electoral College installed the popular vote loser. And one prominent mechanism that can now allow Trump and his associates to evade punishment is also in the Constitution. While there’s serious question about whether Trump can pardon himself, the president is right that he has an absolute power to pardon anyone, and he can pre-emptively pardon anyone who might be implicated in illegal activity on behalf of Trump himself.
But the Constitution does have one remedy: the impeachment power. Trump would be much less likely to fire Mueller if there was a credible threat to remove Trump from office. Nixon’s decision to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox helped create a bipartisan consensus that Nixon had committed impeachable offenses. When Nixon was told that support among Senate Republicans was collapsing, he pre-emptively resigned. If the Republican congressional leadership made it clear that firing Mueller was unacceptable, Trump might be dissuaded, and if he went ahead anyway he could potentially be held accountable at an impeachment trial.