Is 21 Days Long Enough for Ebola Quarantine?

Oh good grief people, relax! The National Journal scares even more.

Two to 21 days. If a person is exposed to the Ebola virus, that’s the timeframe in which the symptoms of the disease can manifest. The disease kills about half of those it infects.

That’s the reality for the friends of Thomas Eric Duncan, the first victim of Ebola to die in the United States, who made contact with him before his hospital admission. According to NPR, the family that made contact with Duncan “has been ordered not to leave their home and is banned from hosting any visitors until the 21-day incubation period for Ebola has passed.” So does that mean that on the 22nd day, they are in the clear, completely safe from contracting Ebola?

No. Sadly, it’s isn’t so simple.

“There is no quarantine time that will provide absolute assurance of no residual risk from contagion.”

“There is no quarantine time that will provide absolute assurance of no residual risk from contagion,” Charles N. Haas, a microbiology threat researcher at Drexel University, writes in a recently publishedpaper in the Journal PLOS Current Outbreaks.

Symptoms typically begin to appear after nine days, but the World Health Organization has even recorded instances of a person contracting the disease after 30 days.

A few weeks ago, when Ebola was starting to permeate the news, Haas began to wonder how WHO came to its 21-day quarantine recommendation for Ebola. Haas then compiled all the available data on previous outbreaks. What he found was that, thankfully, there aren’t many data on past outbreaks. In the past, Ebola has affected a few hundred people at a time; not the thousands who have been blighted in the current crisis. The small number of data points means that while health authorities may have a good idea of how long Ebola can remain dormant in the body, they do not know the upper limits of what is possible.

“If I pulled 12 people at random off the street and measured their height,” Haas explained, “and then used the greatest high of those 12 as an index to what the maximum height would be for the human population, I would be incredibly wrong.”

In his analysis, Haas found that 21 days of quarantine “does not absolutely reduce the risk to zero of somebody subsequently becoming symptomatic,” he said. Depending on the data set, he said, there could be as high as a 12 percent risk that a person will develop symptoms beyond 21 days.

“While the 21 day quarantine value currently used may have arose from reasonable interpretation of early outbreak data, this work suggests a reconsideration is in order and that 21 days may not be sufficiently protective to public health,” his paper concludes.

Staff Favourites View more

Staff Favourites
When you or our staff find great progressive news articles, we post them here. Send along your personal favourite story links to: favourites (at) ukprogressive (dot) co (dot) uk and we may select it for publication.

Leave a Comment